MNSO
Price
$24.52
Change
+$0.15 (+0.62%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.47B
83 days until earnings call
RDNW
Price
$3.95
Change
+$0.13 (+3.40%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
149.93M
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSO vs RDNW

Header iconMNSO vs RDNW Comparison
Open Charts MNSO vs RDNWBanner chart's image
MINISO Group Holding
Price$24.52
Change+$0.15 (+0.62%)
Volume$5.45K
Capitalization7.47B
RideNow Group
Price$3.95
Change+$0.13 (+3.40%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization149.93M
MNSO vs RDNW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSO vs. RDNW commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSO is a Hold and RDNW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSO: $24.52 vs. RDNW: $3.94)
Brand notoriety: MNSO and RDNW are both not notable
MNSO represents the Specialty Stores, while RDNW is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSO: 66% vs. RDNW: 12%
Market capitalization -- MNSO: $7.47B vs. RDNW: $149.93M
MNSO [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $7.47B. RDNW’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $149.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $51.99B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.16B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRDNW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RDNW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSO is a better buy in the long-term than RDNW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDNW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RDNW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDNW is a better buy in the short-term than MNSO.

Price Growth

MNSO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while RDNW (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.35%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNSO is expected to report earnings on Nov 28, 2025.

RDNW is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.38% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.52% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSO($7.47B) has a higher market cap than RDNW($150M). MNSO YTD gains are higher at: 4.116 vs. RDNW (-29.650).
MNSORDNWMNSO / RDNW
Capitalization7.47B150M4,980%
EBITDAN/A-38.2M-
Gain YTD4.116-29.650-14%
P/E Ratio23.17N/A-
RevenueN/A1.11B-
Total CashN/A44.7M-
Total DebtN/A588M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDNW: Fundamental Ratings
RDNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSORDNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOCT46.480.27
+0.59%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Oct
HYGW30.190.04
+0.14%
iShares High Yld Crp Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
GBPUSD1.34N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - United States Dollar
CADCHF0.58N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Switzerland Franc
CNYGBP0.10N/A
N/A
China Yuan - United Kingdom Pound

MNSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNSO and UCAR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNSO and UCAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSO
1D Price
Change %
MNSO100%
-1.93%
UCAR - MNSO
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
WSM - MNSO
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
RDNW - MNSO
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.23%
CARG - MNSO
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
CMEIF - MNSO
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RDNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDNW has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDNW jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDNW
1D Price
Change %
RDNW100%
+5.23%
AN - RDNW
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
HVT - RDNW
45%
Loosely correlated
+5.84%
ONEW - RDNW
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
CWH - RDNW
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
HZO - RDNW
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.23%
More