MNSBP
Price
$24.78
Change
-$0.42 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBCF
Price
$33.83
Change
-$0.19 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.31B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSBP vs SBCF

Header iconMNSBP vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts MNSBP vs SBCFBanner chart's image
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$24.78
Change-$0.42 (-1.67%)
Volume$521
CapitalizationN/A
Seacoast Banking
Price$33.83
Change-$0.19 (-0.56%)
Volume$600.92K
Capitalization3.31B
MNSBP vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
MNSBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSBP vs. SBCF commentary
Jan 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSBP is a Hold and SBCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2026
Stock price -- (MNSBP: $24.78 vs. SBCF: $33.83)
Brand notoriety: MNSBP and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSBP: 32% vs. SBCF: 87%
Market capitalization -- MNSBP: $0 vs. SBCF: $3.31B
MNSBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $158.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than MNSBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSBP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSBP is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

MNSBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 7.654 vs. MNSBP (0.121). SBCF has more cash in the bank: 174M vs. MNSBP (23.9M). MNSBP has less debt than SBCF: MNSBP (69.8M) vs SBCF (797M). SBCF has higher revenues than MNSBP: SBCF (582M) vs MNSBP (72.1M).
MNSBPSBCFMNSBP / SBCF
CapitalizationN/A3.31B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.1217.6542%
P/E RatioN/A20.13-
Revenue72.1M582M12%
Total Cash23.9M174M14%
Total Debt69.8M797M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSBPSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDFAX87.47N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port
EVUYX20.37N/A
N/A
Allspring Util and Telecomms Inst
HACAX115.92-0.23
-0.20%
Harbor Capital Appreciation Instl
ETAEX14.25-0.04
-0.28%
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
MGTSX35.39-0.12
-0.34%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp R6

MNSBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSBP has been loosely correlated with FFWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSBP jumps, then FFWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSBP
1D Price
Change %
MNSBP100%
-1.67%
FFWM - MNSBP
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
SBCF - MNSBP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
MCB - MNSBP
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
ONBPO - MNSBP
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WAL - MNSBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
-0.57%
TRMK - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
UCB - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
UBSI - SBCF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
WSFS - SBCF
87%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
ABCB - SBCF
87%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
More