MNSAF
Price
$2.61
Change
-$0.01 (-0.38%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
738.01M
ORFDF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSAF vs ORFDF

Header iconMNSAF vs ORFDF Comparison
Open Charts MNSAF vs ORFDFBanner chart's image
MINEROS SA
Price$2.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.38%)
Volume$10.45K
Capitalization738.01M
ORECAP INVEST
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization14.41M
MNSAF vs ORFDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSAF vs. ORFDF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSAF is a Buy and ORFDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSAF: $2.61 vs. ORFDF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: MNSAF and ORFDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSAF: 87% vs. ORFDF: 44%
Market capitalization -- MNSAF: $738.01M vs. ORFDF: $14.41M
MNSAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $738.01M. ORFDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileORFDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ORFDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the long-term than ORFDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORFDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ORFDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ORFDF is a better buy in the short-term than MNSAF.

Price Growth

MNSAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.90% price change this week, while ORFDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4896.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSAF($738M) has a higher market cap than ORFDF($14.4M). ORFDF has higher P/E ratio than MNSAF: ORFDF (7.06) vs MNSAF (5.92). MNSAF YTD gains are higher at: 149.435 vs. ORFDF (26.531). MNSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 209M vs. ORFDF (-5.7M). MNSAF has more cash in the bank: 110M vs. ORFDF (15.4M). MNSAF has higher revenues than ORFDF: MNSAF (634M) vs ORFDF (0).
MNSAFORFDFMNSAF / ORFDF
Capitalization738M14.4M5,125%
EBITDA209M-5.7M-3,666%
Gain YTD149.43526.531563%
P/E Ratio5.927.0684%
Revenue634M0-
Total Cash110M15.4M714%
Total Debt25.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORFDF: Fundamental Ratings
ORFDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSAFORFDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGTIX46.680.20
+0.43%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk I
PGPRX27.290.09
+0.33%
George Putnam Balanced R
EIHSX13.380.01
+0.07%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci I
MLMCX22.08N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
NWAUX14.48-0.06
-0.41%
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A

MNSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNSAF and ORFDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNSAF and ORFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSAF
1D Price
Change %
MNSAF100%
-0.53%
ORFDF - MNSAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
HMRFF - MNSAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
DC - MNSAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.77%
KSTBF - MNSAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VIORF - MNSAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+16.57%
More

ORFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORFDF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORFDF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORFDF
1D Price
Change %
ORFDF100%
-1.93%
MNSAF - ORFDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
GLDG - ORFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.85%
GALKF - ORFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
ORZCF - ORFDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
ORLA - ORFDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More