MNSAF
Price
$1.80
Change
-$0.05 (-2.70%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
142.57M
ORFDF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNSAF vs ORFDF

Header iconMNSAF vs ORFDF Comparison
Open Charts MNSAF vs ORFDFBanner chart's image
MINEROS SA
Price$1.80
Change-$0.05 (-2.70%)
Volume$8.71K
Capitalization142.57M
ORECAP INVEST
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.5K
Capitalization6.54M
MNSAF vs ORFDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSAF vs. ORFDF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSAF is a Hold and ORFDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSAF: $1.80 vs. ORFDF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MNSAF and ORFDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSAF: 116% vs. ORFDF: 48%
Market capitalization -- MNSAF: $142.57M vs. ORFDF: $6.54M
MNSAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $142.57M. ORFDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileORFDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ORFDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the long-term than ORFDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORFDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ORFDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ORFDF is a better buy in the short-term than MNSAF.

Price Growth

MNSAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while ORFDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSAF($143M) has a higher market cap than ORFDF($6.54M). ORFDF has higher P/E ratio than MNSAF: ORFDF (19.31) vs MNSAF (14.58). MNSAF YTD gains are higher at: 70.032 vs. ORFDF (23.696). MNSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.5M vs. ORFDF (-1.63M). ORFDF has more cash in the bank: 5.19M vs. MNSAF (170K). ORFDF has less debt than MNSAF: ORFDF (283K) vs MNSAF (46.9M). MNSAF has higher revenues than ORFDF: MNSAF (522M) vs ORFDF (0).
MNSAFORFDFMNSAF / ORFDF
Capitalization143M6.54M2,186%
EBITDA62.5M-1.63M-3,832%
Gain YTD70.03223.696296%
P/E Ratio14.5819.3176%
Revenue522M0-
Total Cash170K5.19M3%
Total Debt46.9M283K16,572%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORFDF: Fundamental Ratings
ORFDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSAFORFDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISTNX83.460.60
+0.72%
Macquarie Science and Technology R6
MUECX34.230.20
+0.59%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity C
MSACX19.210.07
+0.37%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq I
RSPKX22.93-0.02
-0.09%
Victory RS Partners R
BKPIX59.54-0.09
-0.15%
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Inv

MNSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSAF has been loosely correlated with PPTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSAF jumps, then PPTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSAF
1D Price
Change %
MNSAF100%
-2.70%
PPTA - MNSAF
37%
Loosely correlated
-7.99%
ORFDF - MNSAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.34%
HMRFF - MNSAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
DC - MNSAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSTBF - MNSAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ORFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORFDF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORFDF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORFDF
1D Price
Change %
ORFDF100%
+6.34%
MNSAF - ORFDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
GLDG - ORFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
FNMCF - ORFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
GALKF - ORFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.52%
ORZCF - ORFDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-6.05%
More