MNRO
Price
$19.84
Change
+$0.98 (+5.20%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
566.17M
99 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$71.25
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.74B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNRO vs PHIN

Header iconMNRO vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts MNRO vs PHINBanner chart's image
Monro
Price$19.84
Change+$0.98 (+5.20%)
Volume$464
Capitalization566.17M
PHINIA
Price$71.25
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$150
Capitalization2.74B
MNRO vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
MNRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNRO vs. PHIN commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNRO is a Hold and PHIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (MNRO: $18.86 vs. PHIN: $71.27)
Brand notoriety: MNRO and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNRO: 98% vs. PHIN: 147%
Market capitalization -- MNRO: $566.17M vs. PHIN: $2.74B
MNRO [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $566.17M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $81.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNRO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than MNRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNRO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNRO is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -5.84% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNRO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.25% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.74B) has a higher market cap than MNRO($566M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than MNRO: PHIN (31.96) vs MNRO (19.95). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 13.686 vs. MNRO (-5.888). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. MNRO (57.8M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. MNRO (10.5M). MNRO has less debt than PHIN: MNRO (501M) vs PHIN (1.05B). PHIN has higher revenues than MNRO: PHIN (3.43B) vs MNRO (1.19B).
MNROPHINMNRO / PHIN
Capitalization566M2.74B21%
EBITDA57.8M418M14%
Gain YTD-5.88813.686-43%
P/E Ratio19.9531.9662%
Revenue1.19B3.43B35%
Total Cash10.5M349M3%
Total Debt501M1.05B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNRO: Fundamental Ratings
MNRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNROPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGXFX17.660.02
+0.11%
Hartford Global Impact F
FRESX38.66N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Investment Port
IAFMX18.02-0.11
-0.61%
F/m Investments Large Cap Focused Inv
PAGLX44.28-0.43
-0.96%
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Adv
JAENX138.65-1.37
-0.98%
Janus Henderson Enterprise T

MNRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with LIMAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then LIMAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRO
1D Price
Change %
MNRO100%
+1.23%
LIMAF - MNRO
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
GPC - MNRO
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
PHIN - MNRO
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
THRM - MNRO
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
PLOW - MNRO
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been closely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+2.11%
ALV - PHIN
67%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
BWA - PHIN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
APTV - PHIN
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
VC - PHIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
AXL - PHIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
More