Advertisement
MNRIF vs SHALF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNRIF is a Hold and SHALF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNRIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHALF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MNRIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
MNRIF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHALF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.53%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.25% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| MNRIF | SHALF | MNRIF / SHALF | |
| Capitalization | 4.62B | 3.03B | 153% |
| EBITDA | 42.1B | 41.8M | 100,718% |
| Gain YTD | -64.698 | -15.758 | 411% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.57 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 139B | 1.46B | 9,508% |
| Total Cash | 21.6B | 780M | 2,769% |
| Total Debt | 208B | 6.18B | 3,368% |
MNRIF | SHALF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNRIF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHALF (73). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHALF’s over the last 12 months.
MNRIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (100). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.
MNRIF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (97). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.
SHALF's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MNRIF (86). This means that SHALF’s stock grew similarly to MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.
SHALF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRIF (99). This means that SHALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
MNRIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNRIF and SHCO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNRIF and SHCO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNRIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNRIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHCO - MNRIF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| WTBDY - MNRIF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
| SKTP - MNRIF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHALY - MNRIF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMIZF - MNRIF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SHALF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHALF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHALF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHALF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHALF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WTBDY - SHALF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
| SKTP - SHALF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHALY - SHALF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PRSI - SHALF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNRIF - SHALF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||