MNRIF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.52 (-64.20%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.27B
SHALF
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.02 (-3.57%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNRIF vs SHALF

Header iconMNRIF vs SHALF Comparison
Open Charts MNRIF vs SHALFBanner chart's image
Minor International Public
Price$0.29
Change-$0.52 (-64.20%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization4.27B
Shangri-La Asia
Price$0.54
Change-$0.02 (-3.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.07B
MNRIF vs SHALF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNRIF vs. SHALF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNRIF is a Hold and SHALF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MNRIF: $0.29 vs. SHALF: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: MNRIF and SHALF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNRIF: 100% vs. SHALF: 2%
Market capitalization -- MNRIF: $4.27B vs. SHALF: $2.07B
MNRIF [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $4.27B. SHALF’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $2.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $71.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $8.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNRIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHALF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNRIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNRIF and SHALF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHALF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHALF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MNRIF (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHALF (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-0.62% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNRIF($4.27B) has a higher market cap than SHALF($2.07B). SHALF has higher P/E ratio than MNRIF: SHALF (15.43) vs MNRIF (9.11). SHALF YTD gains are higher at: -18.879 vs. MNRIF (-64.698).
MNRIFSHALFMNRIF / SHALF
Capitalization4.27B2.07B206%
EBITDA42.6BN/A-
Gain YTD-64.698-18.879343%
P/E Ratio9.1115.4359%
Revenue159BN/A-
Total Cash17.9BN/A-
Total Debt190BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNRIF vs SHALF: Fundamental Ratings
MNRIF
SHALF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7877
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10044
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRIF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHALF (80). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew significantly faster than SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

MNRIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (100). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

MNRIF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (97). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

SHALF's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MNRIF (78). This means that SHALF’s stock grew similarly to MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

SHALF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRIF (100). This means that SHALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNRIFSHALF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BATT11.220.30
+2.72%
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
BINV37.610.39
+1.05%
Brandes International ETF
NTSX52.56N/A
N/A
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
HAPY24.48N/A
N/A
Harbor Human Capital Factor Uncons ETF
BTCZ3.02-0.11
-3.51%
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF

MNRIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNRIF and SHCO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNRIF and SHCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRIF
1D Price
Change %
MNRIF100%
N/A
SHCO - MNRIF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
WTBDY - MNRIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
SKTP - MNRIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHALY - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMIZF - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHALF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHALF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHALF
1D Price
Change %
SHALF100%
N/A
WTBDY - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
SKTP - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHALY - SHALF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRSI - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNRIF - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More