MNRIF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.52 (-64.20%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.62B
SHALF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNRIF vs SHALF

Header iconMNRIF vs SHALF Comparison
Open Charts MNRIF vs SHALFBanner chart's image
Minor International Public
Price$0.29
Change-$0.52 (-64.20%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization4.62B
Shangri-La Asia
Price$0.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization3.03B
MNRIF vs SHALF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNRIF vs. SHALF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNRIF is a Hold and SHALF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MNRIF: $0.29 vs. SHALF: $0.56)
Brand notoriety: MNRIF and SHALF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNRIF: 100% vs. SHALF: 390%
Market capitalization -- MNRIF: $4.62B vs. SHALF: $3.03B
MNRIF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $4.62B. SHALF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $3.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $72.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNRIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHALF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNRIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNRIF is a better buy in the long-term than SHALF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHALF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHALF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

MNRIF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHALF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+4.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNRIF($4.62B) has a higher market cap than SHALF($3.03B). SHALF YTD gains are higher at: -15.152 vs. MNRIF (-64.698). MNRIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.1B vs. SHALF (41.8M). MNRIF has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. SHALF (780M). SHALF has less debt than MNRIF: SHALF (6.18B) vs MNRIF (208B). MNRIF has higher revenues than SHALF: MNRIF (139B) vs SHALF (1.46B).
MNRIFSHALFMNRIF / SHALF
Capitalization4.62B3.03B153%
EBITDA42.1B41.8M100,718%
Gain YTD-64.698-15.152427%
P/E Ratio22.57N/A-
Revenue139B1.46B9,508%
Total Cash21.6B780M2,769%
Total Debt208B6.18B3,368%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNRIF vs SHALF: Fundamental Ratings
MNRIF
SHALF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRIF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHALF (79). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew significantly faster than SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

MNRIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (100). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

MNRIF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SHALF (97). This means that MNRIF’s stock grew similarly to SHALF’s over the last 12 months.

SHALF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MNRIF (87). This means that SHALF’s stock grew similarly to MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

SHALF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRIF (100). This means that SHALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNRIFSHALF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITEQ55.66N/A
N/A
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
SCLZ52.37N/A
N/A
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
LEMB40.16-0.04
-0.10%
iShares JP Morgan EM Local Ccy Bd ETF
URNM47.11-0.67
-1.40%
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
ETU13.51-0.29
-2.10%
T-REX 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF

MNRIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNRIF and SHCO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNRIF and SHCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRIF
1D Price
Change %
MNRIF100%
N/A
SHCO - MNRIF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBDY - MNRIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
SKTP - MNRIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHALY - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMIZF - MNRIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHALF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHALF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHALF
1D Price
Change %
SHALF100%
N/A
WTBDY - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
SKTP - SHALF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHALY - SHALF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRSI - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNRIF - SHALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More