Advertisement
MNR vs PTXLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNR is a Hold and PTXLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePTXLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MNR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PTXLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTXLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PTXLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
MNR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while PTXLF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.69%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-0.15% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| MNR | PTXLF | MNR / PTXLF | |
| Capitalization | 1.7B | 14.3B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 523M | 224B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -8.582 | -15.000 | 57% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.30 | 6.58 | 111% |
| Revenue | 957M | 295B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 7.79M | 122B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 474M | 126B | 0% |
MNR | PTXLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 5 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNR's Valuation (1) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PTXLF (13) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew similarly to PTXLF’s over the last 12 months.
MNR's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PTXLF (76) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew similarly to PTXLF’s over the last 12 months.
MNR's SMR Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PTXLF (62) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew similarly to PTXLF’s over the last 12 months.
MNR's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PTXLF (78) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew similarly to PTXLF’s over the last 12 months.
PTXLF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MNR (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PTXLF’s stock grew similarly to MNR’s over the last 12 months.
| MNR | PTXLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 31% | 4 days ago 8% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 26% | 4 days ago 7% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 10% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 44% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 22% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TQCAX | 19.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Touchstone Dividend Equity A | |||
| FSBCX | 21.15 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Federated Hermes Global Allocation C | |||
| MLINX | 10.12 | -0.03 | -0.30% |
| NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class | |||
| IGOWX | 62.92 | -0.22 | -0.35% |
| Voya Large-Cap Growth W | |||
| PEDGX | 13.28 | -0.07 | -0.52% |
| Principal Edge MidCap Institutional | |||
MNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNR has been loosely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNR jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNR | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| KRP - MNR | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CRGY - MNR | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| MTDR - MNR | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| SD - MNR | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| OVV - MNR | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||
PTXLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PTXLF and MNR have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTXLF and MNR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTXLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTXLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MNR - PTXLF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| PTRUF - PTXLF | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| RSRV - PTXLF | 0% Poorly correlated | -5.71% | ||
| TTGXF - PTXLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHASF - PTXLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||