Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOZX vs RERGX
MNOZX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts MNOZX vs RERGX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.80
Change+$0.38 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets361.61M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$62.02
Change+$0.35 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
MNOZX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOZX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOZX is a Buy and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. MNOZX (362M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than RERGX: MNOZX (1.21) vs RERGX (0.93). MNOZX was incepted earlier than RERGX: MNOZX (7 years) vs RERGX (16 years). MNOZX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERGX (35.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: RERGX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). RERGX (8.50) and MNOZX (8.44) have marching annual gain over last year. MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.64 vs. RERGX (12.67).
| MNOZX | RERGX | MNOZX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.47 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.47 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.317 | 15.450 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.93 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 8.50 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.54 | 35.83 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.64 | 12.67 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers