Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOZX vs RERGX
MNOZX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts MNOZX vs RERGX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.67M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$61.62
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
MNOZX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOZX vs. RERGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOZX is a Buy and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOZX (367M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than RERGX: MNOZX (1.21) vs RERGX (0.95). MNOZX was incepted earlier than RERGX: MNOZX (7 years) vs RERGX (16 years). MNOZX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERGX (35.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: RERGX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. RERGX (10.20). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 47.86 vs. RERGX (16.38).
| MNOZX | RERGX | MNOZX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.47 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.47 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.250 | 14.706 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 367M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.95 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | 10.20 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 31.12 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.86 | 16.38 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement