Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOZX vs RERGX
MNOZX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts MNOZX vs RERGX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.39
Change+$0.13 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.42M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$64.05
Change+$0.20 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.04B
MNOZX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOZX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOZX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOZX (358M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than RERGX: MNOZX (1.21) vs RERGX (0.93). MNOZX was incepted earlier than RERGX: MNOZX (7 years) vs RERGX (16 years). MNOZX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERGX (35.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: RERGX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. MNOZX (3.66). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 40.23 vs. RERGX (18.15).
| MNOZX | RERGX | MNOZX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.47 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.47 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.223 | 19.229 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.93 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.66 | 6.08 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.41 | 52.25 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.23 | 18.15 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement