Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOSX vs RERBX
MNOSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts MNOSX vs RERBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$36.44
Change-$0.28 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.92M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.89
Change-$1.07 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
MNOSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOSX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOSX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. MNOSX (332M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: MNOSX (0.89) vs RERBX (0.23). MNOSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: MNOSX (7 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than MNOSX (1.07). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: RERBX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.02 vs. MNOSX (11.84). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.32 vs. RERBX (6.29).
| MNOSX | RERBX | MNOSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.56 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.144 | 23.815 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.23 | 386% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 16.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.77 | 33.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.32 | 6.29 | 418% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement