Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOSX vs RERBX
MNOSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts MNOSX vs RERBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$36.63
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.18M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.31
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
MNOSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOSX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOSX is a Hold and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. MNOSX (347M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: MNOSX (0.88) vs RERBX (0.24). MNOSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: MNOSX (7 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than MNOSX (1.07). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: RERBX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. MNOSX (7.61). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.76 vs. RERBX (9.57).
| MNOSX | RERBX | MNOSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.56 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.864 | 20.570 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.24 | 371% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 9.91 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.26 | 45.47 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.76 | 9.57 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement