Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOSX vs REEBX
MNOSX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts MNOSX vs REEBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$36.63
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.18M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$63.82
Change-$0.27 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
MNOSX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOSX vs. REEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOSX is a Hold and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. MNOSX (347M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than REEBX: MNOSX (0.88) vs REEBX (0.40). MNOSX was incepted earlier than REEBX: MNOSX (7 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MNOSX (1.07). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: REEBX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). REEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. MNOSX (7.61). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.76 vs. REEBX (11.70).
| MNOSX | REEBX | MNOSX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.27 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.27 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.864 | 20.986 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.40 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 10.49 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.26 | 47.10 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.76 | 11.70 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement