MNODF
Price
$15.65
Change
-$0.35 (-2.19%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
UPMMY
Price
$28.08
Change
-$0.58 (-2.02%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNODF vs UPMMY

Header iconMNODF vs UPMMY Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs UPMMYBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$15.65
Change-$0.35 (-2.19%)
Volume$334
CapitalizationN/A
UPM-Kymmene
Price$28.08
Change-$0.58 (-2.02%)
Volume$205.89K
Capitalization17.7B
MNODF vs UPMMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. UPMMY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a Hold and UPMMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $15.65 vs. UPMMY: $28.08)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and UPMMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 43% vs. UPMMY: 175%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $0 vs. UPMMY: $17.7B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $0. UPMMY’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $17.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UPMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNODF and UPMMY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPMMY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UPMMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UPMMY is a better buy in the short-term than MNODF.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UPMMY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+1.96% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 12.915 vs. UPMMY (7.760).
MNODFUPMMYMNODF / UPMMY
CapitalizationN/A17.7B-
EBITDAN/A2.28B-
Gain YTD12.9157.760166%
P/E RatioN/A11.71-
RevenueN/A12B-
Total CashN/A886M-
Total DebtN/A3.63B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF vs UPMMY: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
UPMMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8516

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UPMMY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (14). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNODF (100). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMMY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (93). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMMY's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (60). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

MNODF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as UPMMY (37). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to UPMMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNODFUPMMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGHC11.390.47
+4.30%
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
LYFT16.150.44
+2.80%
Lyft
STRRP9.140.10
+1.09%
Star Equity Holdings
MEI10.040.10
+1.01%
Methode Electronics
PMNT0.28-0.03
-8.23%
Perfect Moment Ltd

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
N/A
POELF - MNODF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDGPF - MNODF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
SLVM - MNODF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
HLMMF - MNODF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPMMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPMMY has been closely correlated with SEOAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UPMMY jumps, then SEOAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPMMY
1D Price
Change %
UPMMY100%
-2.02%
SEOAY - UPMMY
71%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
MONDY - UPMMY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
MERC - UPMMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
CFPUF - UPMMY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
SLVM - UPMMY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More