MNODF
Price
$14.30
Change
+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.98B
SLVM
Price
$43.06
Change
+$0.44 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNODF vs SLVM

Header iconMNODF vs SLVM Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs SLVMBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$14.30
Change+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Volume$344
Capitalization5.98B
Sylvamo
Price$43.06
Change+$0.44 (+1.03%)
Volume$218.49K
Capitalization1.74B
MNODF vs SLVM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. SLVM commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a StrongBuy and SLVM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $14.30 vs. SLVM: $43.06)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and SLVM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 0% vs. SLVM: 52%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $5.98B vs. SLVM: $1.74B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $5.98B. SLVM’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNODF is a better buy in the long-term than SLVM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLVM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the short-term than MNODF.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -1.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.64% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNODF($5.98B) has a higher market cap than SLVM($1.74B). MNODF has higher P/E ratio than SLVM: MNODF (28.19) vs SLVM (8.28). MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 3.202 vs. SLVM (-44.283). MNODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 982M vs. SLVM (503M). MNODF has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. SLVM (113M). SLVM has less debt than MNODF: SLVM (813M) vs MNODF (2.81B). MNODF has higher revenues than SLVM: MNODF (7.59B) vs SLVM (3.55B).
MNODFSLVMMNODF / SLVM
Capitalization5.98B1.74B344%
EBITDA982M503M195%
Gain YTD3.202-44.283-7%
P/E Ratio28.198.28340%
Revenue7.59B3.55B214%
Total Cash168M113M149%
Total Debt2.81B813M346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNODFSLVM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSMV53.380.61
+1.16%
VictoryShares US Mult-Fctr Mnmm Vltl ETF
XSW199.511.55
+0.78%
SPDR® S&P Software & Services ETF
GEND11.320.07
+0.61%
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
RECS40.060.24
+0.60%
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
XTJA30.750.09
+0.31%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jan

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
N/A
POELF - MNODF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDGPF - MNODF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
SLVM - MNODF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
HLMMF - MNODF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
+1.03%
CLW - SLVM
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
MERC - SLVM
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
MAGN - SLVM
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.55%
SUZ - SLVM
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
MONDY - SLVM
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
More