Advertisement
MNODF vs SEOJF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a Hold and SEOJF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SEOJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNODF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MNODF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +7.14% price change this week, while SEOJF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (+0.56% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| MNODF | SEOJF | MNODF / SEOJF | |
| Capitalization | 5.99B | 6.75B | 89% |
| EBITDA | 982M | 588M | 167% |
| Gain YTD | 8.225 | -12.205 | -67% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.78 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.59B | 9.37B | 81% |
| Total Cash | 168M | 1.57B | 11% |
| Total Debt | 2.81B | 5.68B | 49% |
MNODF | SEOJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 33 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNODF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (30). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.
MNODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (100). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.
SEOJF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (95). This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.
MNODF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (80). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.
MNODF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (35). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.
| MNODF | SEOJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 19% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 31% | N/A |
Advertisement
MNODF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNODF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNODF | 100% | +7.14% | ||
| POELF - MNODF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NDGPF - MNODF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UPMMY - MNODF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
| SLVM - MNODF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| HLMMF - MNODF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SEOJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOJF and UPMMY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOJF and UPMMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEOJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEOJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| UPMMY - SEOJF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
| WBNEF - SEOJF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNODF - SEOJF | 0% Poorly correlated | +7.14% | ||
| NIJPF - SEOJF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HLMMF - SEOJF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||