MNODF
Price
$14.30
Change
+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.98B
SEOJF
Price
$8.56
Change
-$0.93 (-9.80%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNODF vs SEOJF

Header iconMNODF vs SEOJF Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs SEOJFBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$14.30
Change+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Volume$344
Capitalization5.98B
Stora Enso Oyj
Price$8.56
Change-$0.93 (-9.80%)
Volume$164
Capitalization6.75B
MNODF vs SEOJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. SEOJF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a StrongBuy and SEOJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $14.30 vs. SEOJF: $8.56)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and SEOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 0% vs. SEOJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $5.98B vs. SEOJF: $6.75B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $5.98B. SEOJF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $6.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEOJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNODF is a better buy in the long-term than SEOJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while SEOJF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.64% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEOJF($6.75B) has a higher market cap than MNODF($5.98B). MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 3.202 vs. SEOJF (-12.205). MNODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 982M vs. SEOJF (588M). SEOJF has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. MNODF (168M). MNODF has less debt than SEOJF: MNODF (2.81B) vs SEOJF (5.68B). SEOJF has higher revenues than MNODF: SEOJF (9.37B) vs MNODF (7.59B).
MNODFSEOJFMNODF / SEOJF
Capitalization5.98B6.75B89%
EBITDA982M588M167%
Gain YTD3.202-12.205-26%
P/E Ratio28.19N/A-
Revenue7.59B9.37B81%
Total Cash168M1.57B11%
Total Debt2.81B5.68B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF vs SEOJF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
SEOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6278
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1335
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5044

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNODF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (31). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

MNODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (100). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

SEOJF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (95). This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

MNODF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (78). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

MNODF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOJF (35). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNODFSEOJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBWB79.030.58
+0.74%
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
VYLD27.010.18
+0.66%
Inverse Vix Short-Term Futures Etns Due March 22, 2045
IGPT53.600.05
+0.09%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
UCRD21.73N/A
N/A
VictoryShares Corporate Bond ETF
LITP9.08-0.07
-0.71%
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
N/A
POELF - MNODF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDGPF - MNODF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
SLVM - MNODF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
HLMMF - MNODF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOJF and UPMMY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOJF and UPMMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOJF
1D Price
Change %
SEOJF100%
N/A
UPMMY - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
WBNEF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - SEOJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIJPF - SEOJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLMMF - SEOJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More