MNNGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
65.57M
PNDZF
Price
$151.85
Change
+$2.45 (+1.64%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNNGF vs PNDZF

Header iconMNNGF vs PNDZF Comparison
Open Charts MNNGF vs PNDZFBanner chart's image
Affluent Partners Holdings
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$917
Capitalization65.57M
Pandora A/S
Price$151.85
Change+$2.45 (+1.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.45B
MNNGF vs PNDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNNGF vs. PNDZF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNNGF is a Hold and PNDZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MNNGF: $0.08 vs. PNDZF: $151.85)
Brand notoriety: MNNGF and PNDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNNGF: 152% vs. PNDZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MNNGF: $65.57M vs. PNDZF: $8.45B
MNNGF [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $65.57M. PNDZF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $8.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNNGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNDZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNDZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNDZF is a better buy in the long-term than MNNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNNGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNDZF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNNGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PNDZF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MNNGF and PNDZF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MNNGF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PNDZF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+4.33% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNDZF($8.45B) has a higher market cap than MNNGF($65.6M). MNNGF has higher P/E ratio than PNDZF: MNNGF (31.15) vs PNDZF (12.36). MNNGF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. PNDZF (-14.489). PNDZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.75B vs. MNNGF (13.5M). PNDZF has more cash in the bank: 541M vs. MNNGF (17.3M). MNNGF has less debt than PNDZF: MNNGF (5.23M) vs PNDZF (10.8B). PNDZF has higher revenues than MNNGF: PNDZF (26.6B) vs MNNGF (81.5M).
MNNGFPNDZFMNNGF / PNDZF
Capitalization65.6M8.45B1%
EBITDA13.5M8.75B0%
Gain YTD60.000-14.489-414%
P/E Ratio31.1512.36252%
Revenue81.5M26.6B0%
Total Cash17.3M541M3%
Total Debt5.23M10.8B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNNGF vs PNDZF: Fundamental Ratings
MNNGF
PNDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5137
SMR RATING
1..100
9712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4376
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10080
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNDZF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNNGF (87). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MNNGF (51). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNNGF (97). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (76). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MNNGF (100). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNNGFPNDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OUSA53.610.33
+0.62%
ALPS O'Shares US Quality Div ETF
MCHS28.69N/A
N/A
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
MAXI30.31-0.03
-0.10%
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Inc ETF
RCS6.94-0.01
-0.14%
PIMCO STRATEGIC Income FUND
MBB93.57-0.34
-0.36%
iShares MBS ETF

MNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNNGF and REAL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNNGF and REAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNNGF
1D Price
Change %
MNNGF100%
N/A
REAL - MNNGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
LVMHF - MNNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
DCOHF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNDZF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - MNNGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PNDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNDZF and MENEF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNDZF and MENEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNDZF
1D Price
Change %
PNDZF100%
N/A
MENEF - PNDZF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HESAF - PNDZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
LVMUY - PNDZF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
MNNGF - PNDZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMHF - PNDZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More