Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMRX vs VWINX
MNMRX vs VWINX Comparison
Open Charts MNMRX vs VWINX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.91M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income I
Price$25.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.3B
MNMRX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMRX vs. VWINX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMRX is a Buy and VWINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWINX has more cash in the bank: 49.3B vs. MNMRX (296M). VWINX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: VWINX (3.35) vs MNMRX (1.93). MNMRX was incepted earlier than VWINX: MNMRX (16 years) vs VWINX (56 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VWINX (0.23). VWINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. MNMRX (59.00). MNMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWINX: MNMRX (2000) vs VWINX (3000). VWINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. MNMRX (3.10). MNMRX return over 5 years is better than : 2.05 vs. VWINX (0.24).
| MNMRX | VWINX | MNMRX / VWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.23 | 557% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.23 | 557% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.974 | 5.255 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 49.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 3.35 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 4.83 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.74 | 11.46 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.05 | 0.24 | 855% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.08 | 25.46 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement