Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMRX vs VWINX
MNMRX vs VWINX Comparison
Open Charts MNMRX vs VWINX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.62
Change-$0.46 (-3.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.51M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income I
Price$25.85
Change-$0.49 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.41B
MNMRX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMRX vs. VWINX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMRX is a Buy and VWINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWINX has more cash in the bank: 48.4B vs. MNMRX (291M). VWINX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: VWINX (3.43) vs MNMRX (1.74). MNMRX was incepted earlier than VWINX: MNMRX (16 years) vs VWINX (56 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VWINX (0.23). MNMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. VWINX (63.00). MNMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWINX: MNMRX (2000) vs VWINX (3000). VWINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. MNMRX (3.26). MNMRX (1.42) and VWINX (1.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MNMRX | VWINX | MNMRX / VWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.23 | 557% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.23 | 557% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.412 | 1.572 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 48.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 3.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 5.18 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.98 | 10.47 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.42 | 1.37 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.46 | 29.27 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement