Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMCX vs VWINX
MNMCX vs VWINX Comparison
Open Charts MNMCX vs VWINX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.69
Change-$0.40 (-2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.51M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income I
Price$25.85
Change-$0.49 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.41B
MNMCX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMCX vs. VWINX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMCX is a Buy and VWINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWINX has more cash in the bank: 48.4B vs. MNMCX (291M). VWINX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: VWINX (3.43) vs MNMCX (1.18). MNMCX was incepted earlier than VWINX: MNMCX (16 years) vs VWINX (56 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VWINX (0.23). MNMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. VWINX (63.00). MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWINX: MNMCX (2000) vs VWINX (3000). VWINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. MNMCX (2.81). VWINX return over 5 years is better than : 1.37 vs. MNMCX (-1.55).
| MNMCX | VWINX | MNMCX / VWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.23 | 787% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.23 | 787% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.410 | 1.572 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 48.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 3.43 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 5.18 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.19 | 10.47 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.55 | 1.37 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.90 | 29.27 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers