Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMCX vs VTMFX
MNMCX vs VTMFX Comparison
Open Charts MNMCX vs VTMFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.69
Change-$0.40 (-2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.51M
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Adm
Price$49.74
Change+$1.00 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.52B
MNMCX vs VTMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMCX vs. VTMFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMCX is a Buy and VTMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. MNMCX (291M). VTMFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: VTMFX (2.11) vs MNMCX (1.18). MNMCX was incepted earlier than VTMFX: MNMCX (16 years) vs VTMFX (31 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VTMFX (0.09). MNMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. VTMFX (20.00). MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMFX: MNMCX (2000) vs VTMFX (10000). VTMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. MNMCX (2.81). VTMFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.48 vs. MNMCX (-1.55).
| MNMCX | VTMFX | MNMCX / VTMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.09 | 2,011% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.09 | 2,011% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.410 | 1.056 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 10000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 11.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 2.11 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 8.45 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.19 | 32.78 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.55 | 33.48 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.90 | 103.36 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers