Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMCX vs VTMFX
MNMCX vs VTMFX Comparison
Open Charts MNMCX vs VTMFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.63M
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Adm
Price$49.48
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.51B
MNMCX vs VTMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMCX vs. VTMFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMCX is a Buy and VTMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. MNMCX (296M). VTMFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: VTMFX (2.07) vs MNMCX (1.41). MNMCX was incepted earlier than VTMFX: MNMCX (16 years) vs VTMFX (31 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VTMFX (0.09). MNMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. VTMFX (20.00). MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMFX: MNMCX (2000) vs VTMFX (10000). VTMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. MNMCX (3.01). VTMFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.04 vs. MNMCX (-0.59).
| MNMCX | VTMFX | MNMCX / VTMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.09 | 2,011% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.09 | 2,011% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.887 | 9.454 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 10000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 11.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.07 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 8.08 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.92 | 38.70 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.59 | 36.04 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.46 | 94.86 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement