Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGWBX
MNHRX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.42
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.89M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.68
Change-$0.17 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
MNHRX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. MNHRX (441M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHRX (0.23) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHRX (16 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than MNHRX (1.30). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.69 vs. MNHRX (-1.34). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.86 vs. MNHRX (-6.05).
| MNHRX | RGWBX | MNHRX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.46 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.46 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.710 | 1.052 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 10.69 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 48.42 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.05 | 17.86 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.32 | 114.42 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement