Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGWAX
MNHRX vs RGWAX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGWAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$26.75
Change+$0.21 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.75M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R1
Price$27.01
Change+$0.23 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.99B
MNHRX vs RGWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGWAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWAX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. MNHRX (474M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RGWAX: MNHRX (0.46) vs RGWAX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGWAX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RGWAX (13 years). RGWAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than MNHRX (1.30). RGWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGWAX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. MNHRX (5.60). RGWAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.03 vs. MNHRX (12.68).
| MNHRX | RGWAX | MNHRX / RGWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.47 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.47 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.701 | 10.561 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | 10.15 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.91 | 44.85 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.68 | 42.03 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.47 | 73.48 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers