Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGWAX
MNHRX vs RGWAX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGWAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.77
Change-$0.40 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.06M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R1
Price$25.68
Change-$0.33 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.12B
MNHRX vs RGWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGWAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWAX has more cash in the bank: 22.1B vs. MNHRX (466M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RGWAX: MNHRX (0.48) vs RGWAX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGWAX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RGWAX (13 years). RGWAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than MNHRX (1.30). RGWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGWAX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.49 vs. MNHRX (3.03). RGWAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.43 vs. MNHRX (11.97).
| MNHRX | RGWAX | MNHRX / RGWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.47 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.47 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.792 | 5.117 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 22.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | 7.49 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.17 | 40.20 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.97 | 41.43 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.12 | 62.13 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement