Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.42
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.89M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$29.02
Change-$0.18 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGSFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. MNHRX (441M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGSFX (0.53) vs MNHRX (0.23). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHRX (16 years) vs RGSFX (10 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. MNHRX (-1.34). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.91 vs. MNHRX (-6.05).
| MNHRX | RGSFX | MNHRX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.51 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.51 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.710 | 1.143 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.53 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 12.05 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 53.41 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.05 | 23.91 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.32 | 127.70 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement