Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RBGEX
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$27.78
Change+$0.16 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets451.89M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$29.62
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RBGEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a StrongBuy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. MNHRX (452M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHRX (0.45) vs RBGEX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. MNHRX (0.21). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 30.43 vs. MNHRX (0.34).
| MNHRX | RBGEX | MNHRX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.17 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.17 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.653 | 18.629 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 452M | 24.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | 9.57 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.77 | 47.28 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.34 | 30.43 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.73 | 90.39 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers