Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RBGEX
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.42
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.89M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$28.33
Change-$0.17 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RBGEX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. MNHRX (441M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHRX (0.23) vs RBGEX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHRX (16 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.18). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. MNHRX (-1.34). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 20.04 vs. MNHRX (-6.05).
| MNHRX | RBGEX | MNHRX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.18 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.18 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.710 | 1.100 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 11.15 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 50.01 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.05 | 20.04 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.32 | 118.70 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement