Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$26.54
Change+$0.20 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.75M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$26.91
Change+$0.23 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.99B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. MNHCX (474M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.19) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (16 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. MNHCX (5.02). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.98 vs. MNHCX (3.90).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.415 | 10.559 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.02 | 10.15 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.01 | 44.88 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.90 | 41.98 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.18 | 73.32 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers