Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.58
Change-$0.40 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.04M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.58
Change-$0.32 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.83B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. MNHCX (458M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.20) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.48 vs. MNHCX (2.44). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. MNHCX (3.29).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.566 | 5.094 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 21.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.44 | 7.48 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.40 | 40.13 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.29 | 41.37 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.51 | 61.94 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers