Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.15M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$29.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. MNHCX (454M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.19) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (16 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. MNHCX (-0.31). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.92 vs. MNHCX (-8.14).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.644 | 20.707 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 24.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 11.58 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.52 | 57.08 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.14 | 30.92 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.88 | 95.38 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement