Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RBGEX
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.31
Change-$1.57 (-5.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.13M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$28.50
Change-$0.77 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RBGEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. MNHCX (443M). MNHCX (0.00) and RBGEX (0.00) have matching dividends . MNHCX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHCX (16 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.18). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. MNHCX (-1.94). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 20.04 vs. MNHCX (-11.94).
| MNHCX | RBGEX | MNHCX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.18 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.18 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.676 | 1.100 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 443M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | 11.15 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.14 | 50.01 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.94 | 20.04 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.69 | 118.70 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers