Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNECX vs RLBFX
MNECX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNECX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term L
Price$20.45
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.72M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.57
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
MNECX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNECX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNECX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNECX (510M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNECX: RLBFX (2.05) vs MNECX (1.10). MNECX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNECX (16 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNECX: RLBFX (250) vs MNECX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. MNECX (0.38). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.33 vs. MNECX (-3.41).
| MNECX | RLBFX | MNECX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.29 | 614% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | 0.29 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.794 | 13.390 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 8.42 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.91 | 52.65 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.41 | 46.33 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.45 | 86.14 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement