MNDJF
Price
$2.91
Change
-$0.13 (-4.28%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
63 days until earnings call
XPRCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

MNDJF vs XPRCF

Header iconMNDJF vs XPRCF Comparison
Open Charts MNDJF vs XPRCFBanner chart's image
Mandalay Resources
Price$2.91
Change-$0.13 (-4.28%)
Volume$40.64K
CapitalizationN/A
XPLORE RES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
MNDJF vs XPRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNDJF vs. XPRCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNDJF is a Hold and XPRCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MNDJF: $2.91 vs. XPRCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: MNDJF and XPRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNDJF: 162% vs. XPRCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MNDJF: $118.5M vs. XPRCF: $1.04M
MNDJF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $118.5M. XPRCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNDJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXPRCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNDJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XPRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNDJF is a better buy in the long-term than XPRCF.

Price Growth

MNDJF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.24% price change this week, while XPRCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNDJF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNDJF($118M) has a higher market cap than XPRCF($1.04M). MNDJF YTD gains are higher at: 111.159 vs. XPRCF (100.000). MNDJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 63.6M vs. XPRCF (-196.44K). MNDJF has more cash in the bank: 36.5M vs. XPRCF (88.6K). MNDJF has higher revenues than XPRCF: MNDJF (180M) vs XPRCF (0).
MNDJFXPRCFMNDJF / XPRCF
Capitalization118M1.04M11,401%
EBITDA63.6M-196.44K-32,376%
Gain YTD111.159100.000111%
P/E Ratio8.47N/A-
Revenue180M0-
Total Cash36.5M88.6K41,196%
Total Debt23.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNDJF: Fundamental Ratings
MNDJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

MNDJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNDJF and OCGSF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNDJF and OCGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNDJF
1D Price
Change %
MNDJF100%
-4.14%
OCGSF - MNDJF
24%
Poorly correlated
-10.70%
TORXF - MNDJF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
GAYMF - MNDJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSTXF - MNDJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
WRLGF - MNDJF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
More

XPRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XPRCF and WKGFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XPRCF and WKGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPRCF
1D Price
Change %
XPRCF100%
N/A
WKGFF - XPRCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - XPRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
RDGMF - XPRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
MNDJF - XPRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
GGAZF - XPRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
More