Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.72M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$38.47
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Hold and RLEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBRX (510M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (1.97) vs MNBRX (1.63). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. MNBRX (0.93). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. MNBRX (1.12).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.221 | 13.317 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.97 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | 8.31 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.81 | 52.20 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | 45.69 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement