Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.75
Change-$0.16 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.44M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$39.04
Change-$0.49 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a StrongBuy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MNBRX (443M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (1.89) vs MNBRX (1.60). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. MNBRX (4.16). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.71 vs. MNBRX (-1.68).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.398 | 14.996 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 443M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 8.96 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.66 | 43.39 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.68 | 40.71 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement