Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$19.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.2M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$37.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Hold and RLEFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MNBRX (436M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (1.86) vs MNBRX (1.59). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (16 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. MNBRX (-0.51). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. MNBRX (-0.87).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.622 | 10.872 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.51 | 9.28 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.16 | 38.81 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.87 | 35.80 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.33 | 75.29 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement