Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets523.35M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$37.27
Change-$0.15 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.61B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a StrongBuy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. MNBRX (523M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (2.00) vs MNBRX (1.65). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.99 vs. MNBRX (2.32). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. MNBRX (-0.52).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.599 | 9.427 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.00 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.32 | 6.99 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.04 | 31.22 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.52 | 38.72 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement