Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLBGX
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.72M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$38.53
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLBGX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Hold and RLBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBRX (510M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLBGX (2.09) vs MNBRX (1.63). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. MNBRX (0.93). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.60 vs. MNBRX (1.12).
| MNBRX | RLBGX | MNBRX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.221 | 13.449 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | 8.49 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.81 | 52.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | 46.60 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.61 | 86.69 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement