Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLBGX
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$21.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.24M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLBGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Buy and RLBGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MNBRX (439M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLBGX (1.98) vs MNBRX (1.59). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. MNBRX (3.05). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.12 vs. MNBRX (-3.27).
| MNBRX | RLBGX | MNBRX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.346 | 16.953 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.98 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.05 | 9.66 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.13 | 41.58 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.27 | 41.12 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.35 | 78.24 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement