Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLBGX
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.75
Change-$0.16 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.44M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.11
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a StrongBuy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MNBRX (443M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLBGX (2.01) vs MNBRX (1.60). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. MNBRX (4.16). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.37 vs. MNBRX (-1.68).
| MNBRX | RLBGX | MNBRX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.398 | 16.570 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 443M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.01 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 10.35 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.66 | 44.95 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.68 | 43.37 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.20 | 81.84 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers