Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RAMHX
MNBRX vs RAMHX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RAMHX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets523.35M
American Funds American Balanced R2E
Price$37.08
Change-$0.14 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.61B
MNBRX vs RAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RAMHX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a StrongBuy and RAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAMHX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. MNBRX (523M). MNBRX pays higher dividends than RAMHX: MNBRX (1.65) vs RAMHX (1.42). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RAMHX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RAMHX (11 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RAMHX (1.04). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RAMHX (44.00). RAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RAMHX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RAMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. MNBRX (2.32). RAMHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.98 vs. MNBRX (-0.52).
| MNBRX | RAMHX | MNBRX / RAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.04 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.04 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.599 | 9.006 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.42 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.32 | 6.32 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.04 | 29.06 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.52 | 34.98 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.78 | 66.71 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement