Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RAMHX
MNBRX vs RAMHX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RAMHX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$21.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.24M
American Funds American Balanced R2E
Price$39.61
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
MNBRX vs RAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RAMHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Buy and RAMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAMHX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MNBRX (439M). MNBRX pays higher dividends than RAMHX: MNBRX (1.59) vs RAMHX (1.31). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RAMHX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RAMHX (11 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RAMHX (1.04). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RAMHX (44.00). RAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RAMHX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RAMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. MNBRX (3.05). RAMHX return over 5 years is better than : 36.44 vs. MNBRX (-3.27).
| MNBRX | RAMHX | MNBRX / RAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.04 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.04 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.346 | 16.080 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.05 | 8.76 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.13 | 38.40 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.27 | 36.44 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.35 | 69.33 | 18% |