MNBO
Price
$31.35
Change
+$1.35 (+4.50%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.79M
SBGOF
Price
$12.54
Change
-$0.24 (-1.88%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
17.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNBO vs SBGOF

Header iconMNBO vs SBGOF Comparison
Open Charts MNBO vs SBGOFBanner chart's image
MNB Holdings
Price$31.35
Change+$1.35 (+4.50%)
Volume$300
Capitalization12.79M
Standard Bank Group
Price$12.54
Change-$0.24 (-1.88%)
Volume$3.68K
Capitalization17.82B
MNBO vs SBGOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNBO vs. SBGOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBO is a Hold and SBGOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MNBO: $31.35 vs. SBGOF: $12.55)
Brand notoriety: MNBO and SBGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNBO: 107% vs. SBGOF: 271%
Market capitalization -- MNBO: $12.79M vs. SBGOF: $17.82B
MNBO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.79M. SBGOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $17.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNBO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBGOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNBO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBGOF is a better buy in the long-term than MNBO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNBO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBGOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNBO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNBO is a better buy in the short-term than SBGOF.

Price Growth

MNBO (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBGOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBGOF($17.8B) has a higher market cap than MNBO($12.8M). MNBO YTD gains are higher at: 25.400 vs. SBGOF (13.324). SBGOF has higher revenues than MNBO: SBGOF (138B) vs MNBO (9.4M).
MNBOSBGOFMNBO / SBGOF
Capitalization12.8M17.8B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.40013.324191%
P/E RatioN/A7.87-
Revenue9.4M138B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A31.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNBO vs SBGOF: Fundamental Ratings
MNBO
SBGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3248
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNBO's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBGOF (65). This means that MNBO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBGOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNBO (100). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNBO’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNBO (89). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNBO’s over the last 12 months.

MNBO's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SBGOF (56). This means that MNBO’s stock grew similarly to SBGOF’s over the last 12 months.

MNBO's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as SBGOF (48). This means that MNBO’s stock grew similarly to SBGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNBOSBGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COPAF0.08N/A
+3.02%
CopAur Minerals Inc.
CMPRF2.02N/A
N/A
Gentera Sab De CV
BCCOY0.80N/A
N/A
BICO GROUP AB
SGIOY8.65-0.19
-2.15%
Shionogi & Co. Ltd.
HCKG21.50-0.50
-2.27%
Hocking Valley Bancshares, Inc. (OH)

MNBO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNBO and FGFI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNBO and FGFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNBO
1D Price
Change %
MNBO100%
N/A
FGFI - MNBO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFA - MNBO
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBGOF - MNBO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANDC - MNBO
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLC - MNBO
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBGOF has been loosely correlated with MTPOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBGOF jumps, then MTPOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBGOF
1D Price
Change %
SBGOF100%
N/A
MTPOF - SBGOF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIHHF - SBGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKNIY - SBGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
MNBO - SBGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A