Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBGX
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.87M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.59
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. MNBAX (447M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBGX (2.01) vs MNBAX (1.83). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. MNBAX (4.36). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.37 vs. MNBAX (8.38).
| MNBAX | RLBGX | MNBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.650 | 16.570 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 268B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.01 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.36 | 10.35 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.52 | 44.95 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.38 | 43.37 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.78 | 81.84 | 50% |