Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBGX
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.11M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.79
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. MNBAX (437M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBGX (1.98) vs MNBAX (1.82). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. MNBAX (3.25). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.12 vs. MNBAX (6.54).
| MNBAX | RLBGX | MNBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.598 | 16.953 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 271B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.98 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 9.66 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.95 | 41.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | 41.12 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.48 | 78.24 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers