Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.11M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. MNBAX (437M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (1.93) vs MNBAX (1.82). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. MNBAX (3.25). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. MNBAX (6.54).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.598 | 16.889 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 271B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.93 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 9.63 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.95 | 41.38 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | 40.86 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.48 | 77.79 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement