Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.96M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. MNBAX (508M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (2.00) vs MNBAX (1.85). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. MNBAX (2.61). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. MNBAX (9.57).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.191 | 14.890 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 265B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 2.00 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.61 | 9.05 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.71 | 51.85 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.57 | 43.90 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.44 | 78.80 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement