Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.87M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. MNBAX (447M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (1.97) vs MNBAX (1.83). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. MNBAX (4.36). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. MNBAX (8.38).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.650 | 16.507 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 268B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.97 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.36 | 10.28 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.52 | 44.74 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.38 | 43.06 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.78 | 81.39 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement