Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBEX
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.87M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$39.48
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. MNBAX (447M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MNBAX (1.83) vs RLBEX (1.71). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBEX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. MNBAX (4.36). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. MNBAX (8.38).
| MNBAX | RLBEX | MNBAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.650 | 16.221 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 268B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.71 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.36 | 9.94 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.52 | 43.51 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.38 | 41.28 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.78 | 80.23 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement