Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.87M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.28
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. MNBAX (447M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.83) vs RLBCX (1.46). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. MNBAX (4.36). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. MNBAX (8.38).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.650 | 15.928 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 268B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.36 | 9.58 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.52 | 42.30 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.38 | 39.44 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.78 | 74.61 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement