Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.11M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. MNBAX (437M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.82) vs RLBCX (1.44). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.93 vs. MNBAX (3.25). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. MNBAX (6.54).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.598 | 16.253 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 271B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.44 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 8.93 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.95 | 39.00 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | 37.26 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.48 | 71.11 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers