Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBBX
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets533.3M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$36.57
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. MNBAX (533M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: MNBAX (1.88) vs RLBBX (1.17). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MNBAX (1.02). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBBX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. MNBAX (6.47). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.07 vs. MNBAX (13.88).
| MNBAX | RLBBX | MNBAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.888 | 7.674 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 533M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.17 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.47 | 7.05 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.78 | 32.48 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | 37.07 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.49 | 58.03 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement