Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBBX
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.42
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets508.41M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.19
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. MNBAX (508M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: MNBAX (1.86) vs RLBBX (1.15). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MNBAX (1.02). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBBX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. MNBAX (1.12). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. MNBAX (11.42).
| MNBAX | RLBBX | MNBAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.410 | 12.553 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 262B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.15 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | 7.30 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.69 | 48.20 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.42 | 40.04 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.77 | 74.60 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement