Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBBX
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$21.08
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.37M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$39.34
Change-$0.49 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MNBAX (439M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: MNBAX (1.82) vs RLBBX (1.07). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MNBAX (1.02). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBBX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. MNBAX (3.88). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.40 vs. MNBAX (7.35).
| MNBAX | RLBBX | MNBAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.849 | 17.386 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.07 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.88 | 9.74 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.75 | 40.84 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.35 | 36.40 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.58 | 72.64 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers