Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBBX
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.33
Change+$0.06 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets528.01M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$36.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. MNBAX (528M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: MNBAX (1.88) vs RLBBX (1.17). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MNBAX (1.02). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBBX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. MNBAX (5.98). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.33 vs. MNBAX (11.80).
| MNBAX | RLBBX | MNBAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.941 | 8.557 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.17 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 9.41 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.85 | 32.13 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.80 | 35.33 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.79 | 58.04 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement