Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBBX
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets523.41M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$37.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.64B
MNBAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. MNBAX (523M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: MNBAX (1.89) vs RLBBX (1.16). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MNBAX (1.02). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBBX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.99 vs. MNBAX (3.13). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.87 vs. MNBAX (9.91).
| MNBAX | RLBBX | MNBAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.941 | 9.205 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.16 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 6.99 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.05 | 28.55 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.91 | 33.87 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.04 | 64.99 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers