MNAT vs SBNY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNAT is a Hold and SBNY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MNAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
MNAT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.97% price change this week, while SBNY (@Regional Banks) price change was -14.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
SBNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| MNAT | SBNY | MNAT / SBNY | |
| Capitalization | 122M | 3.15M | 3,874% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.851 | -20.045 | -9% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.96 | 0.00 | 361,380% |
| Revenue | 64.9M | 2.7B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 31.3M | 11.3B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 144M | 2.31B | 6% |
MNAT | SBNY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNAT (11) in the null industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to MNAT’s over the last 12 months.
MNAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SBNY (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MNAT’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.
SBNY's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNAT (48) in the null industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNAT’s over the last 12 months.
SBNY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNAT (47) in the null industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to MNAT’s over the last 12 months.
MNAT's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SBNY (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MNAT’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
MNAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNAT and PFBN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNAT and PFBN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNAT | 100% | -7.76% | ||
| PFBN - MNAT | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SBNY - MNAT | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.88% | ||
| BSPA - MNAT | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BSSC - MNAT | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BKCYF - MNAT | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SBNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SBNY and MNAT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBNY and MNAT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBNY | 100% | -5.88% | ||
| MNAT - SBNY | 27% Poorly correlated | -7.76% | ||
| CITZ - SBNY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PFBN - SBNY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FXLG - SBNY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BAOB - SBNY | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.58% | ||
More | ||||