MNAT
Price
$31.20
Change
-$0.31 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
121.92M
PFBN
Price
$8.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.63M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNAT vs PFBN

Header iconMNAT vs PFBN Comparison
Open Charts MNAT vs PFBNBanner chart's image
Marquette National
Price$31.20
Change-$0.31 (-0.98%)
Volume$3.7K
Capitalization121.92M
Pacific Alliance Bank (CA)
Price$8.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization6.63M
MNAT vs PFBN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNAT vs. PFBN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNAT is a Hold and PFBN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MNAT: $31.20 vs. PFBN: $8.60)
Brand notoriety: MNAT and PFBN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNAT: 380% vs. PFBN: 23%
Market capitalization -- MNAT: $121.92M vs. PFBN: $6.63M
MNAT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $121.92M. PFBN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFBN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MNAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFBN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNAT is a better buy in the long-term than PFBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNAT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFBN’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNAT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PFBN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNAT is a better buy in the short-term than PFBN.

Price Growth

MNAT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while PFBN (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNAT($122M) has a higher market cap than PFBN($6.63M). MNAT YTD gains are higher at: 12.758 vs. PFBN (-3.320). PFBN has less debt than MNAT: PFBN (1.9M) vs MNAT (144M). MNAT has higher revenues than PFBN: MNAT (64.9M) vs PFBN (1.18M).
MNATPFBNMNAT / PFBN
Capitalization122M6.63M1,840%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.758-3.320-384%
P/E Ratio6.96N/A-
Revenue64.9M1.18M5,523%
Total Cash31.3MN/A-
Total Debt144M1.9M7,579%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNAT vs PFBN: Fundamental Ratings
MNAT
PFBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5191
SMR RATING
1..100
4593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFBN's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MNAT (21). This means that PFBN’s stock grew similarly to MNAT’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFBN (91). This means that MNAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFBN’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFBN (93). This means that MNAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFBN’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBN (60). This means that MNAT’s stock grew similarly to PFBN’s over the last 12 months.

PFBN's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MNAT (38). This means that PFBN’s stock grew similarly to MNAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNATPFBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGBPP0.06N/A
+8.80%
Regen Biopharma, Inc.
GRRLF0.12N/A
N/A
Grange Resources Ltd.
HLKHF92.56N/A
N/A
Hella Gmbh & Co Kgaa
TIKK3.62N/A
N/A
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
PPTTF12.11N/A
N/A
Perpetual Ltd

MNAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNAT and PFBN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNAT and PFBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNAT
1D Price
Change %
MNAT100%
N/A
PFBN - MNAT
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNY - MNAT
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSPA - MNAT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSSC - MNAT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKCYF - MNAT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PFBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFBN and MTFC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFBN and MTFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFBN
1D Price
Change %
PFBN100%
N/A
MTFC - PFBN
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNAT - PFBN
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNY - PFBN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTNB - PFBN
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
PRMY - PFBN
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More