Advertisement
MNARF vs NWHUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNARF is a Hold and NWHUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNARF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWHUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MNARF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NWHUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNARF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWHUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNARF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NWHUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MNARF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWHUF (@Managed Health Care) price change was +0.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.24%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.40% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Managed Health Care (+1.22% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| MNARF | NWHUF | MNARF / NWHUF | |
| Capitalization | 476M | 913M | 52% |
| EBITDA | 175M | 9.34M | 1,873% |
| Gain YTD | 13.701 | 17.685 | 77% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.86 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 352M | 420M | 84% |
| Total Cash | 66M | 80M | 83% |
| Total Debt | 1.77B | 2.88B | 62% |
MNARF | NWHUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWHUF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MNARF (13). This means that NWHUF’s stock grew similarly to MNARF’s over the last 12 months.
MNARF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NWHUF (100). This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to NWHUF’s over the last 12 months.
MNARF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as NWHUF (95). This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to NWHUF’s over the last 12 months.
MNARF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NWHUF (54). This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to NWHUF’s over the last 12 months.
NWHUF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MNARF (18). This means that NWHUF’s stock grew similarly to MNARF’s over the last 12 months.
| MNARF | NWHUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 29% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 24% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 25% | 5 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 31% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
MNARF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNARF has been loosely correlated with CCPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNARF jumps, then CCPPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNARF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNARF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CCPPF - MNARF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AEDFF - MNARF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JRFIF - MNARF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WRDEF - MNARF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NWHUF - MNARF | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
More | ||||
NWHUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWHUF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWHUF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWHUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWHUF | 100% | +1.95% | ||
| RIOCF - NWHUF | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| CDPYF - NWHUF | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| CWYUF - NWHUF | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| DREUF - NWHUF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BYLOF - NWHUF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||