Advertisement
MNARF vs MRTI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNARF is a Hold and MRTI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNARF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRTI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MNARF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRTI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNARF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRTI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNARF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MRTI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MNARF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -3.56% price change this week, while MRTI (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -6.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (+1.00% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| MNARF | MRTI | MNARF / MRTI | |
| Capitalization | 642M | 71M | 904% |
| EBITDA | 175M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.838 | -7.019 | -26% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.96 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 352M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 66M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.77B | N/A | - |
MNARF | MRTI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNARF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRTI (56). This means that MNARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRTI’s over the last 12 months.
MRTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as MNARF (80). This means that MRTI’s stock grew similarly to MNARF’s over the last 12 months.
MRTI's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNARF (84). This means that MRTI’s stock grew significantly faster than MNARF’s over the last 12 months.
MRTI's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MNARF (61). This means that MRTI’s stock grew similarly to MNARF’s over the last 12 months.
MRTI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNARF (88). This means that MRTI’s stock grew significantly faster than MNARF’s over the last 12 months.
| MNARF | MRTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 20% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | N/A |
Advertisement
MNARF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNARF and BSRTF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNARF and BSRTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNARF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNARF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BSRTF - MNARF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| DOC - MNARF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| JRFIF - MNARF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAC - MNARF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| DHC - MNARF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MRTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRTI and MEIYF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRTI and MEIYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRTI | 100% | N/A | ||
| MEIYF - MRTI | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NWHUF - MRTI | -1% Poorly correlated | +6.16% | ||
| MNARF - MRTI | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NPONF - MRTI | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A |