Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMUKX vs PCUFX
MMUKX vs PCUFX Comparison
Open Charts MMUKX vs PCUFX
MMUKX vs PCUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMUKX vs. PCUFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMUKX is a Hold and PCUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCUFX has more cash in the bank: 3.28B vs. MMUKX (2.59B). MMUKX pays higher dividends than PCUFX: MMUKX (2.27) vs PCUFX (1.17). MMUKX was incepted earlier than PCUFX: MMUKX (14 years) vs PCUFX (31 years). PCUFX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MMUKX (0.67). MMUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. PCUFX (47.00). MMUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCUFX: MMUKX (0) vs PCUFX (1000). MMUKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.49 vs. PCUFX (1.99). MMUKX return over 5 years is better than : 18.92 vs. PCUFX (-3.35).
| MMUKX | PCUFX | MMUKX / PCUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.61 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.61 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.810 | 1.080 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 3.28B | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.17 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.49 | 1.99 | 879% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | 4.29 | 400% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.92 | -3.35 | -565% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.99 | 41.44 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement