Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMUKX vs PCUFX
MMUKX vs PCUFX Comparison
Open Charts MMUKX vs PCUFX
MMUKX vs PCUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMUKX vs. PCUFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMUKX is a Hold and PCUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCUFX has more cash in the bank: 3.43B vs. MMUKX (2.6B). MMUKX pays higher dividends than PCUFX: MMUKX (2.19) vs PCUFX (1.29). MMUKX was incepted earlier than PCUFX: MMUKX (13 years) vs PCUFX (31 years). PCUFX (1.63) is less costly to investors than MMUKX (0.67). MMUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. PCUFX (47.00). MMUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCUFX: MMUKX (0) vs PCUFX (1000). MMUKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. PCUFX (3.25). MMUKX return over 5 years is better than : 32.39 vs. PCUFX (15.24).
| MMUKX | PCUFX | MMUKX / PCUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.63 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.63 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.567 | 12.457 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 3.43B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.29 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.39 | 3.25 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.43 | 13.39 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.39 | 15.24 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.42 | 39.70 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers