Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMUFX vs PCUFX
MMUFX vs PCUFX Comparison
Open Charts MMUFX vs PCUFX
MMUFX vs PCUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMUFX vs. PCUFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMUFX is a Hold and PCUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCUFX has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. MMUFX (2.57B). MMUFX pays higher dividends than PCUFX: MMUFX (1.92) vs PCUFX (1.17). MMUFX was incepted earlier than PCUFX: MMUFX (34 years) vs PCUFX (32 years). PCUFX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MMUFX (1.01). PCUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. MMUFX (14.00). MMUFX (1000) and PCUFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.40 vs. PCUFX (-1.15). MMUFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.97 vs. PCUFX (-3.68).
| MMUFX | PCUFX | MMUFX / PCUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.61 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.61 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.227 | 0.540 | 412% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 3.22B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.17 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.40 | -1.15 | -1,252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 8.85 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.97 | -3.68 | -515% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.56 | 32.97 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers