MMTMF
Price
$0.97
Change
+$0.02 (+2.11%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
322.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PZG
Price
$1.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
92.46M
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMTMF vs PZG

Header iconMMTMF vs PZG Comparison
Open Charts MMTMF vs PZGBanner chart's image
Monument Mining
Price$0.97
Change+$0.02 (+2.11%)
Volume$28.93K
Capitalization322.94M
Paramount Gold Nevada
Price$1.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$146.48K
Capitalization92.46M
MMTMF vs PZG Comparison Chart in %
MMTMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PZG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMTMF vs. PZG commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMTMF is a Buy and PZG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MMTMF: $0.97 vs. PZG: $1.18)
Brand notoriety: MMTMF and PZG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MMTMF: 38% vs. PZG: 24%
Market capitalization -- MMTMF: $322.94M vs. PZG: $92.46M
MMTMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $322.94M. PZG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $92.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $121.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MMTMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePZG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MMTMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PZG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMTMF is a better buy in the long-term than PZG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMTMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMTMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PZG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PZG is a better buy in the short-term than MMTMF.

Price Growth

MMTMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +19.67% price change this week, while PZG (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

PZG is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMTMF($323M) has a higher market cap than PZG($92.5M). MMTMF YTD gains are higher at: 422.973 vs. PZG (245.029). MMTMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.3M vs. PZG (-10.09M). MMTMF has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. PZG (4.17M). MMTMF has less debt than PZG: MMTMF (115K) vs PZG (11.7M). MMTMF has higher revenues than PZG: MMTMF (112M) vs PZG (0).
MMTMFPZGMMTMF / PZG
Capitalization323M92.5M349%
EBITDA71.3M-10.09M-707%
Gain YTD422.973245.029173%
P/E Ratio7.44N/A-
Revenue112M0-
Total Cash62.5M4.17M1,500%
Total Debt115K11.7M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMTMF vs PZG: Fundamental Ratings
MMTMF
PZG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
289
SMR RATING
1..100
3197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PZG's Valuation (43) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMTMF (88) in the null industry. This means that PZG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMTMF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZG (89) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MMTMF’s stock grew significantly faster than PZG’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZG (97) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MMTMF’s stock grew significantly faster than PZG’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PZG (37) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to PZG’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZG (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MMTMF’s stock grew significantly faster than PZG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMTMFPZG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMTMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PZG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AANNF3.72N/A
N/A
Aroundtown SA
GNGXF0.22N/A
N/A
Inventus Mining Corp.
STJO0.02N/A
N/A
St. Joseph, Inc.
SWPFF2.62N/A
N/A
Swire Properties Ltd.
VDEVF35.66N/A
N/A
Van de Velde NV

MMTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMTMF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMTMF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMTMF
1D Price
Change %
MMTMF100%
+1.32%
AUGO - MMTMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
PZG - MMTMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MJGCF - MMTMF
-9%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%

PZG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZG has been loosely correlated with AUST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZG jumps, then AUST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZG
1D Price
Change %
PZG100%
N/A
AUST - PZG
34%
Loosely correlated
-8.74%
TGMR - PZG
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IAG - PZG
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
PAAS - PZG
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
DRD - PZG
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
More