MMTLF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.55M
TAOFF
Price
$3.05
Change
+$0.05 (+1.67%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
136.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMTLF vs TAOFF

Header iconMMTLF vs TAOFF Comparison
Open Charts MMTLF vs TAOFFBanner chart's image
Critical One Energy
Price$0.33
Change-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Volume$174
Capitalization6.55M
IPERIONX
Price$3.05
Change+$0.05 (+1.67%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization136.77M
MMTLF vs TAOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MMTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMTLF vs. TAOFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMTLF is a Hold and TAOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MMTLF: $0.33 vs. TAOFF: $3.05)
Brand notoriety: MMTLF and TAOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MMTLF: 2% vs. TAOFF: 3%
Market capitalization -- MMTLF: $6.55M vs. TAOFF: $136.77M
MMTLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.55M. TAOFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $136.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MMTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MMTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MMTLF and TAOFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMTLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMTLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TAOFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAOFF is a better buy in the short-term than MMTLF.

Price Growth

MMTLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.41% price change this week, while TAOFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAOFF($137M) has a higher market cap than MMTLF($6.55M). MMTLF YTD gains are higher at: 76.241 vs. TAOFF (-14.566). MMTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.77M vs. TAOFF (-19.66M). TAOFF has more cash in the bank: 11.4M vs. MMTLF (594K). MMTLF (0) and TAOFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MMTLFTAOFFMMTLF / TAOFF
Capitalization6.55M137M5%
EBITDA-2.77M-19.66M14%
Gain YTD76.241-14.566-523%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash594K11.4M5%
Total DebtN/A1.15M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMTLFTAOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSIGX23.080.40
+1.76%
Jacob Small Cap Growth Institutional
OBSIX27.020.37
+1.39%
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Instl
NQVRX59.400.60
+1.02%
Nuveen Multi Cap Value I
JENSX59.990.57
+0.96%
Jensen Quality Growth J
MSACX19.210.03
+0.16%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq I

MMTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMTLF has been loosely correlated with SLROF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMTLF jumps, then SLROF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMTLF
1D Price
Change %
MMTLF100%
-3.67%
SLROF - MMTLF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWXPF - MMTLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAXPF - MMTLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABRMF - MMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAOFF - MMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TAOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOFF and CAXPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOFF and CAXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAOFF
1D Price
Change %
TAOFF100%
N/A
CAXPF - TAOFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MMTLF - TAOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
FXRVF - TAOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLI - TAOFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
WCUFF - TAOFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
More