Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMSIX vs NAESX
MMSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MMSIX vs NAESX
Praxis Small Cap Index I
Price$12.25
Change+$0.08 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.35M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
MMSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMSIX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. MMSIX (193M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MMSIX: NAESX (1.28) vs MMSIX (1.16). MMSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MMSIX (18 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MMSIX (0.44) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MMSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.31 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMSIX: NAESX (3000) vs MMSIX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. MMSIX (2.47). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. MMSIX (56.29).
| MMSIX | NAESX | MMSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.17 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.17 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.425 | 2.781 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 193M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.28 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.47 | 8.46 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.15 | 34.15 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.29 | 66.66 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.25 | 114.71 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement