Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMKBX vs RNWHX
MMKBX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MMKBX vs RNWHX
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts A
Price$13.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.45M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.66
Change-$0.26 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MMKBX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMKBX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMKBX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MMKBX (128M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MMKBX: RNWHX (1.33) vs MMKBX (1.01). MMKBX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MMKBX (30 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MMKBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MMKBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMKBX: RNWHX (250) vs MMKBX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.86 vs. MMKBX (-31.17). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. MMKBX (-47.03).
| MMKBX | RNWHX | MMKBX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.72 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.549 | 4.057 | 112% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.17 | 28.86 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.86 | 42.44 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.03 | 13.21 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.27 | 121.60 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement