Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMKBX vs RNWHX
MMKBX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MMKBX vs RNWHX
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts A
Price$14.52
Change-$11.67 (-44.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.18M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MMKBX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMKBX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMKBX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MMKBX (134M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MMKBX: RNWHX (1.25) vs MMKBX (0.97). MMKBX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MMKBX (30 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MMKBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MMKBX (41.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMKBX: RNWHX (250) vs MMKBX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.68 vs. MMKBX (-29.14). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. MMKBX (-45.43).
| MMKBX | RNWHX | MMKBX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.72 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.083 | 6.092 | 166% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.25 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.14 | 27.68 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.01 | 43.24 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.43 | 11.69 | -389% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.57 | 124.21 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers