Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMECX vs SSGSX
MMECX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MMECX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Discovery C
Price$22.91
Change+$0.08 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.6M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.07B
MMECX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMECX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMECX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.07B vs. MMECX (66.6M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than MMECX: SSGSX (0.61) vs MMECX (0.00). MMECX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MMECX (29 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). MMECX (5.42) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MMECX (33.00). MMECX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. MMECX (2.05). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -4.85 vs. MMECX (-8.94).
| MMECX | SSGSX | MMECX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 1.23 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.42 | 1.23 | 441% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.479 | 4.632 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.6M | 5.07B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 2.79 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.63 | -1.97 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.94 | -4.85 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.26 | 49.63 | 1% |