Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMDEX vs RGACX
MMDEX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MMDEX vs RGACX
Praxis Growth Index I
Price$54.88
Change+$0.49 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets715.45M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
MMDEX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMDEX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMDEX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MMDEX (715M). MMDEX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MMDEX (0.43) vs RGACX (0.07). MMDEX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MMDEX (18 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than MMDEX (0.35). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MMDEX (16.48). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMDEX: RGACX (250) vs MMDEX (100000). MMDEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.25 vs. RGACX (17.83). MMDEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.52 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| MMDEX | RGACX | MMDEX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.94 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.94 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.541 | 15.516 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 715M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.07 | 605% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.25 | 17.83 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.32 | 58.53 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.52 | 40.02 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 245.39 | 95.93 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement