Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMDEX vs RGACX
MMDEX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MMDEX vs RGACX
Praxis Growth Index I
Price$56.95
Change+$0.28 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.92M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
MMDEX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMDEX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMDEX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MMDEX (730M). MMDEX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MMDEX (0.41) vs RGACX (0.07). MMDEX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MMDEX (18 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than MMDEX (0.35). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MMDEX (16.48). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMDEX: RGACX (250) vs MMDEX (100000). MMDEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.96 vs. RGACX (11.01). MMDEX return over 5 years is better than : 69.44 vs. RGACX (37.85).
| MMDEX | RGACX | MMDEX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.94 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.94 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.917 | 17.655 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 730M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.07 | 590% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.96 | 11.01 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.56 | 70.57 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.44 | 37.85 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 247.62 | 96.78 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement