MMC
Price
$183.85
Change
+$1.06 (+0.58%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
90.07B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLQT
Price
$1.56
Change
-$0.06 (-3.70%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
274.52M
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMC vs SLQT

Header iconMMC vs SLQT Comparison
Open Charts MMC vs SLQTBanner chart's image
Marsh & McLennan Companies
Price$183.85
Change+$1.06 (+0.58%)
Volume$2.38M
Capitalization90.07B
SelectQuote
Price$1.56
Change-$0.06 (-3.70%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization274.52M
MMC vs SLQT Comparison Chart in %
MMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLQT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMC vs. SLQT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMC is a Buy and SLQT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MMC: $183.85 vs. SLQT: $1.56)
Brand notoriety: MMC and SLQT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MMC: 84% vs. SLQT: 98%
Market capitalization -- MMC: $90.07B vs. SLQT: $274.52M
MMC [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $90.07B. SLQT’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $274.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $90.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $14.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MMC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMC is a better buy in the long-term than SLQT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLQT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMC is a better buy in the short-term than SLQT.

Price Growth

MMC (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а +4.12% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -7.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -27.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

MMC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

SLQT is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (-0.94% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMC($90.1B) has a higher market cap than SLQT($275M). SLQT has higher P/E ratio than MMC: SLQT (156.00) vs MMC (22.04). MMC YTD gains are higher at: -12.570 vs. SLQT (-56.452). MMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.23B vs. SLQT (148M). SLQT has less debt than MMC: SLQT (416M) vs MMC (21.6B). MMC has higher revenues than SLQT: MMC (25.8B) vs SLQT (1.53B).
MMCSLQTMMC / SLQT
Capitalization90.1B275M32,764%
EBITDA7.23B148M4,884%
Gain YTD-12.570-56.45222%
P/E Ratio22.04156.0014%
Revenue25.8B1.53B1,690%
Total CashN/A32.4M-
Total Debt21.6B416M5,192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMC: Fundamental Ratings
MMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMCSLQT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLQT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HKND35.870.18
+0.52%
Humankind US Stock ETF
MOAT101.920.31
+0.31%
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
OVM21.61-0.03
-0.14%
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
CTBB19.95-0.07
-0.35%
Qwest Corp
KSA39.17-0.22
-0.56%
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF

MMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMC has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMC jumps, then AON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMC
1D Price
Change %
MMC100%
+0.48%
AON - MMC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
BRO - MMC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
AJG - MMC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
WTW - MMC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
ERIE - MMC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More

SLQT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLQT has been loosely correlated with EHTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLQT jumps, then EHTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLQT
1D Price
Change %
SLQT100%
+1.25%
EHTH - SLQT
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
GOCO - SLQT
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
BRO - SLQT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
CRVL - SLQT
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
MMC - SLQT
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More