MMC
Price
$186.21
Change
+$2.74 (+1.49%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
91.23B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLQT
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.03 (-1.99%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
260.44M
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMC vs SLQT

Header iconMMC vs SLQT Comparison
Open Charts MMC vs SLQTBanner chart's image
Marsh & McLennan Companies
Price$186.21
Change+$2.74 (+1.49%)
Volume$2.93M
Capitalization91.23B
SelectQuote
Price$1.48
Change-$0.03 (-1.99%)
Volume$834.17K
Capitalization260.44M
MMC vs SLQT Comparison Chart in %
MMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLQT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMC vs. SLQT commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMC is a Buy and SLQT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MMC: $183.47 vs. SLQT: $1.51)
Brand notoriety: MMC and SLQT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MMC: 122% vs. SLQT: 111%
Market capitalization -- MMC: $91.23B vs. SLQT: $260.44M
MMC [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $91.23B. SLQT’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $260.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $91.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $14.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MMC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMC is a better buy in the long-term than SLQT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLQT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MMC and SLQT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MMC (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +4.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

MMC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

SLQT is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (+1.13% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMC($91.2B) has a higher market cap than SLQT($260M). SLQT has higher P/E ratio than MMC: SLQT (148.00) vs MMC (22.33). MMC YTD gains are higher at: -12.244 vs. SLQT (-59.409). MMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.33B vs. SLQT (133M). MMC has more cash in the bank: 2.51B vs. SLQT (10.7M). SLQT has less debt than MMC: SLQT (423M) vs MMC (21.4B). MMC has higher revenues than SLQT: MMC (26.5B) vs SLQT (1.56B).
MMCSLQTMMC / SLQT
Capitalization91.2B260M35,077%
EBITDA7.33B133M5,512%
Gain YTD-12.244-59.40921%
P/E Ratio22.33148.0015%
Revenue26.5B1.56B1,695%
Total Cash2.51B10.7M23,467%
Total Debt21.4B423M5,059%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMC: Fundamental Ratings
MMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMCSLQT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLQT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAPRF65.993.99
+6.44%
Naspers Ltd.
DPMLF29.680.86
+2.98%
DPM Metals Inc.
SOMC23.99N/A
N/A
Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.
TKCBY22.95N/A
N/A
Tokai Carbon Company Ltd.
GNSMF0.08N/A
N/A
MOROCCO STRATEGIC MINERALS CORP.

MMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMC has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMC jumps, then AON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMC
1D Price
Change %
MMC100%
+1.40%
AON - MMC
86%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
BRO - MMC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
AJG - MMC
71%
Closely correlated
+2.98%
WTW - MMC
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
ERIE - MMC
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
More

SLQT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLQT has been loosely correlated with EHTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLQT jumps, then EHTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLQT
1D Price
Change %
SLQT100%
+8.63%
EHTH - SLQT
49%
Loosely correlated
+5.85%
GOCO - SLQT
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
BRO - SLQT
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
CRVL - SLQT
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
MMC - SLQT
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More