Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLXCX vs SMRPX
MLXCX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLXCX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLXCX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MLXCX (350M). MLXCX (4.41) and SMRPX (4.22) have matching dividends . MLXCX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: MLXCX (11 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). MLXCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. MLXCX (16.00). MLXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: MLXCX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. MLXCX (-8.09). MLXCX return over 5 years is better than : 155.29 vs. SMRPX (135.35).
| MLXCX | SMRPX | MLXCX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.02 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 1.05 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.685 | 8.317 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 350M | 1.31B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 4.22 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.09 | 7.66 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 70.88 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 155.29 | 135.35 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.07 | 213.70 | 91% |