Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLXCX vs OSPAX
MLXCX vs OSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLXCX vs. OSPAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLXCX is a Buy and OSPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. MLXCX (330M). OSPAX pays higher dividends than MLXCX: OSPAX (5.22) vs MLXCX (4.71). MLXCX was incepted earlier than OSPAX: MLXCX (11 years) vs OSPAX (13 years). OSPAX (6.29) is less costly to investors than MLXCX (2.45). OSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MLXCX (16.00). MLXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OSPAX: MLXCX (2500) vs OSPAX (1000000). OSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.78 vs. MLXCX (-11.36). OSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 216.42 vs. MLXCX (153.23).
| MLXCX | OSPAX | MLXCX / OSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 6.29 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 6.29 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.736 | 3.558 | -330% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 1.03B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.71 | 5.22 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.36 | 2.78 | -409% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.79 | 77.68 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 153.23 | 216.42 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.25 | 128.44 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement