Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLXCX vs OSPAX
MLXCX vs OSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLXCX vs. OSPAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLXCX is a Hold and OSPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. MLXCX (341M). OSPAX pays higher dividends than MLXCX: OSPAX (5.15) vs MLXCX (4.43). MLXCX was incepted earlier than OSPAX: MLXCX (11 years) vs OSPAX (12 years). OSPAX (6.29) is less costly to investors than MLXCX (2.48). OSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MLXCX (16.00). MLXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OSPAX: MLXCX (2500) vs OSPAX (1000000). OSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. MLXCX (-2.53). OSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 258.61 vs. MLXCX (194.25).
| MLXCX | OSPAX | MLXCX / OSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 6.29 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 6.29 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.795 | -1.518 | 711% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341M | 1.01B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.43 | 5.15 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.53 | 6.18 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.16 | 72.40 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 194.25 | 258.61 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.96 | 73.32 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers