Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLXCX vs OSPAX
MLXCX vs OSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLXCX vs. OSPAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLXCX is a Hold and OSPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. MLXCX (350M). OSPAX pays higher dividends than MLXCX: OSPAX (4.99) vs MLXCX (4.41). MLXCX was incepted earlier than OSPAX: MLXCX (11 years) vs OSPAX (13 years). OSPAX (6.29) is less costly to investors than MLXCX (2.45). OSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MLXCX (16.00). MLXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OSPAX: MLXCX (2500) vs OSPAX (1000000). OSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.19 vs. MLXCX (-8.09). OSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 218.05 vs. MLXCX (155.29).
| MLXCX | OSPAX | MLXCX / OSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 6.29 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 6.29 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.685 | 6.677 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 350M | 1.07B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 4.99 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.09 | 4.19 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 80.08 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 155.29 | 218.05 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.07 | 195.42 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement