Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLVGX vs RWEBX
MLVGX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLVGX vs RWEBX
MFS Low Volatility Equity C
Price$19.79
Change+$0.09 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets354.22M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.42
Change+$0.38 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
MLVGX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLVGX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLVGX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. MLVGX (354M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than MLVGX: RWEBX (0.78) vs MLVGX (0.23). MLVGX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: MLVGX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). MLVGX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MLVGX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLVGX: RWEBX (250) vs MLVGX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. MLVGX (-5.52). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.70 vs. MLVGX (17.10).
| MLVGX | RWEBX | MLVGX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.06 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.06 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.548 | 7.651 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.78 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.52 | 7.12 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.98 | 32.20 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.10 | 46.70 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.88 | 77.32 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement