Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLVBX vs RWEBX
MLVBX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLVBX vs RWEBX
MFS Low Volatility Equity B
Price$19.98
Change+$0.20 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.61M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.35
Change+$0.41 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
MLVBX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLVBX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLVBX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. MLVBX (353M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than MLVBX: RWEBX (0.78) vs MLVBX (0.19). MLVBX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: MLVBX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). MLVBX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MLVBX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLVBX: RWEBX (250) vs MLVBX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.86 vs. MLVBX (-6.32). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.01 vs. MLVBX (20.50).
| MLVBX | RWEBX | MLVBX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.06 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.06 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.044 | 9.129 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.78 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.32 | 4.86 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 43.19 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.50 | 53.01 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.49 | 87.41 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement